sayedit.com

    Before & After

    examples that help you write

    We demonstrate how to use specific writing techniques to:

    • organize information, and
    • drive the narrative.

    We select excerpts of often-cited articles that are significant and accessible, but written in poor academic English.

    We hope our B&A examples are helpful to  your writing.

    Patrick Han & the [ sayedit.com ] team

    BEFORE

    Original: Sanger et al. PNAS 74, 1977, 5463-67
    > 60,000 citations

     A new method for determining nucleotide sequences in DNA is described. It is similar to the “plus and minus” method [Sanger, F. & Coulson, A. R. (1975) J. Mol. Biol. 94, 441-448] but makes use of the 2′,3′-dideoxy and arabinonucleoside analogues of the normal deoxynucleoside triphosphates, which act as specific chain-terminating inhibitors of DNA polymerase. The technique has been applied to the DNA of bacteriophage ϕX174 and is more rapid and more accurate than either the plus or the minus method.

    AFTER

    Editing Technique:
    Rewrite in the Active Voice

     We present a new DNA nucleotide sequencing method with greater speed and accuracy than the current “plus and minus” method [Sanger, F. & Coulson, A. R. (1975) J. Mol. Biol. 94, 441-448]. Our method uses 2′,3′-dideoxy and arabinonucleoside analogues of the normal deoxynucleoside triphosphates as specific chain-terminating inhibitors of DNA polymerase. We demonstrate this method by sequencing the DNA of bacteriophage ϕX174.

    BEFORE

    Original: Saiki et al. Science 239, 1988, 487-91
    > 20,000 citations

    A thermostable DNA polymerase was used in an in vitro DNA amplification procedure, the polymerase chain reaction. The enzyme, isolated from Thermus aquaticus, greatly simplifies the procedure and, by enabling the amplification reaction to be performed at higher temperatures, significantly improves the specificity, yield, sensitivity, and length of products that can be amplified. Single-copy genomic sequences were amplified by a factor of more than 10 million with very high specificity, and DNA segments up to 2000 base pairs were readily amplified. In addition, the method was used to amplify and detect a target DNA molecule present only once in a sample of 105 cells.

    AFTER

    Editing Technique:
    Present Narrative Tense

    We use a thermostable polymerase enzyme to improve the known polymerase chain reaction in vitro DNA amplification. The new enzyme enables higher temperature amplification, which simplifies the overall procedure and enhances the specificity, yield, sensitivity and length of the target product. Our new method can amplify single-copy genomic sequences of up to 2000 base pairs by a factor of more than 10 million with very high specificity. We demonstrate this by detecting the presence of a single target DNA molecule in a sample of 105 cells.

    BEFORE

    Original: Chomczynski et al. Anal. Biochem. 162, 1987, 156-9
    > 60.000 citations

    Guanidinium thiocyanate and chloride are among the most effective protein denaturants (1,2). As a strong inhibitor of ribonucleases, guanidinium chloride was first introduced as a deproteinization agent for isolation of RNA by Cox (3). Since then guanidinium extraction has become the method of choice for RNA purification, replacing phenol extraction. Guanidinium methods have been used successfully by Chirgwin et al. (4) to isolate undegraded RNA from ribonuclease-rich tissues like pancreas. Chirgwin’s protocol for ultracentrifugation of a guanidinium thiocyanate lysate through CsCl cushion has become one of the most frequently used isolation of undegraded RNA. In the present report, a new rapid procedure combining guanidinium thiocyanate and phenol-chloroform extraction is described…
    (see entire B&A)

    AFTER

    Editing Technique:
    Break up a Single Paragraph into Two

    Current RNA extraction methods that use guanidinium thiocyanate and chloride as deproteinization agents are outcompeting older methods such as phenol extraction (1-3). Recent breakthroughs have used the ultracentrifugation of a guanidinium thiocyanate lysate through CsCl cushion to extract undegraded RNA from ribonuclease-rich tissues, expanding the capabilities of guanidinium methods (4). However, the need for a ultracentrifugation step still hinders simultaneous processing of samples in large number, greatly reducing the RNA yield.

    Here, we describe a new procedure that combines guanidinium and phenol extraction methods…
    (see entire B&A)

    BEFORE

    Original: Thompson et al. Nucleic Acid Res. 25, 1997, 4876-82
    > 30,000 citations

    The most widely used method in molecular biology to align sets of nucleotide or amino acid sequences, is to build up a multiple alignment progressively (1-2). The most closely related groups of sequences are aligned first and then these groups are gradually aligned together, keeping the early alignments fixed. This approach works well when the sequences are sufficiently closely related. However, a globally optimal solution (or a biologically significant one) cannot be guaranteed. In more difficult cases, where many sequences have <30% residue identity, this automatic method becomes less reliable. Any misaligned regions introduced in previous stages of the progressive alignment are not corrected later as new information from other sequences is added. In such cases, the automatic alignments need to be refined, either manually or automatically

    AFTER

    Editing Technique:
    Removal of Unnecessary Adverbs

    The progressive method is a popular approach to multiple sequence alignment (MSA) of biomolecular structures (1-2). However, because this method generates MSA by first aligning the most related sequences before adding less related ones in succession, it also propagates alignment errors made at any stage throughout the process. Therefore, optimal progressive MSA of real biological sequences (often with < 30 % residue identity) requires the ability to correct for any misalignment…

    BEFORE

    Original: Baron & Kenny J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 51, 1986,
    1173-82, > 45,000 citations

    An example of a moderator-type effect in this context is the demonstration of a crossover interaction of the form that the insufficient justification effect holds under public commitment (e.g., attitude change is inversely related to incentive), whereas attitude change is directly related to level of incentive when the counter-attitudinal action occurs in private (cf. Collins & Hoyt, 1972). A moderator-interaction effect also would be said to occur if a relation is substantially reduced instead of being reversed, for example, if we find no difference under the private condition.

    AFTER

    Editing Technique:
    Using action verbs instead of “to be”

    Examples of confirmed moderator effects include the reversal of the insufficient justification effects, observed when the experimental settings are switched from public to private, changing the relationship between attitude change and incentive from inverse to direct, respectively (cf. Collins & Hoyt, 1972). We note that the moderator-effect confirmation does not require actual reversal of the insufficient justification effects—a substantial reduction of the relationship suffices.